Service
Research Application Review
Written feedback on application structure, concept positioning and how clearly your research idea is presented.
Who it's for
Researchers with a grant or fellowship application draft that needs feedback before submission.
What you receive
Written comments on the application's structure, positioning and central idea, with revision priorities.
What this scope covers
Structure and flow
- Feedback on the order, flow and readability of the application.
Concept positioning
- Comments on how the research aims, hypothesis and contribution are presented.
- Notes on whether methods and feasibility support the aims.
Reviewer-style critique
- Reviewer-style comments and a list of revision priorities.
Application support
Make your aims and plan easy to assess.
Research aim
What question will the project answer?
Working hypothesis
What explanation will you test?
Methods and feasibility
How will the methods test the idea?
Expected contribution
What could the work add to the field?
Reviewer-style critique is not an official funder review or a funding guarantee.
How we work
Agree the application length, stage and follow-up before work begins. Reviewer-style feedback is not an official funder assessment.
Not part of this scope
- Official funder review or privileged knowledge of panels.
- Guaranteed funding, budget certification or institutional submission.
- Writing an application from invented evidence.
You approve the final work and any submission. Authors remain responsible for the work and for following institutional, journal and funder rules on professional assistance and AI disclosure.
Tell us which task you need help with.
A short, non-confidential outline is enough for the first enquiry. We agree scope and document handling before files are shared.